ReexamLink | Tim Bianchi
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About Tim Bianchi

Tag Archives: 35 USC 122

Patent Challengers get additional Preissuance Challenge Option after Leahy-Smith Bill Passes

Posted on September 5, 2011 by Tim Bianchi

Pre-Issuance Challenge Option Added Section 8 of the Act provides for additional pre-issuance submissions by third parties by amending 35 U.S.C. 122.  Written submission of the relevance of a patent application,  patent, published patent application, or other printed publication must … Continue reading →

Posted in America Invents Act, Ex Parte Prosecution, ex parte reexamination, inter partes reexamination, inter partes review, Patent Reform, Post Grant Review, preissuance submissions by third parties, reexamination generally, Uncategorized | Tagged 35 USC 122, America Invents Act, Bianchi, ex parte prosecution, ex parte reexamination, inter partes reexamination, inter partes review, issued patent, Leahy-Smith, patent reform, Preissuance Submission, reexam, reexamination, SNQ, substantial new question of patentability, Tim Bianchi | 3 Comments
  • Follow on Twitter Follow on LinkedIn
  • Archives

  • Categories

    • Adjudicative instead of examinatorial (2)
    • America Invents Act (86)
    • Aqua Products (1)
    • Boardside Chat Report (1)
    • Book and Article Reviews (1)
    • BRI v. Phillips Construction Issues (1)
    • Broadest Reasonable Interpretation standard (16)
    • claim challenges (40)
      • indefiniteness (5)
      • patent-eligible subject matter (17)
      • prior art (13)
      • statutory subject matter (8)
    • Claim Construction (18)
    • Claim Preclusion (1)
    • clear and convincing evidence (7)
    • doctrine of claim differentiation (2)
    • Ex Parte Prosecution (23)
      • preissuance submissions by third parties (2)
    • Federal Circuit (17)
      • remand to PTAB (1)
      • Reversal With No Remand (1)
      • Stay in Federal Circuit (4)
    • Federal Circuit Review of PTAB Proceedings (4)
    • inequitable conduct (2)
      • but-for Therasense standard (1)
    • inter partes review (73)
      • 315(b) One Year Bar (7)
        • Correction of Petition After Bar (2)
        • Indemnification (1)
      • estoppel (14)
        • raised or reasonably could have raised (5)
      • IPR Joinder (4)
      • Motion to Amend (3)
      • serial petitions (2)
    • IPR (2)
    • Issue Preclusion (1)
    • ITC (1)
    • joint infringement (1)
    • Litigation (85)
      • Damages (17)
        • enhanced damages (1)
        • future damages (3)
        • intervening rights (5)
          • absolute intervening rights (2)
          • equitable intervening rights (2)
        • past damages (9)
      • estoppel from administrative proceeding (11)
      • Expert (2)
      • Joinder Post AIA (5)
      • Phillips claim construction (1)
      • Prosecution Bar (4)
      • Protective Order (3)
      • stay (11)
        • factors for stay (8)
    • Mandamus Actions in the Federal Circuit (4)
    • Patent Portfolio Management (2)
      • Prosecution Guidelines (1)
    • Patent Reform (51)
    • petitions practice (12)
    • Phillips-type construction (7)
    • Post Grant Review (71)
      • covered business methods (56)
      • estoppel (13)
        • raised or reasonably could have raised (4)
    • preponderance of evidence (8)
    • pro hac vice admission (3)
    • PRPS Patent Review Processing System (13)
    • PTAB (82)
      • Amended Rulemaking (1)
      • Depositions (2)
      • Expert Witnesses (2)
      • Joinder of AIA Proceedings (8)
      • Joinder of Parties Post-petition (4)
      • motion practice (20)
      • rehearing request (2)
      • stay of other administrative proceedings (1)
    • PTAB Patent Trials (49)
      • Future of PTAB Trial Practice (10)
    • PTO Sued Under the APA (11)
    • reexamination generally (57)
      • Appealable (8)
      • correcting reexamination using post-issuance review (1)
      • ex parte reexamination (23)
      • inter partes reexamination (22)
      • merger (2)
      • Procedural – Petitionable (4)
      • reexamination pendency (4)
      • Special Dispatch (3)
      • Substantial New Question (SNQ) (11)
    • Reissue (6)
    • Settlements in Post-Grant Proceedings (3)
    • software patents (2)
    • States rights and sovereign immunity (2)
    • supplemental examination (3)
    • Supreme Court Review of post-grant issues (2)
      • Broadest Reasonable Interpretation (2)
    • Termination of Post-Grant Proceedings (9)
    • Uncategorized (64)
    • Webinar (1)
ReexamLink | Tim Bianchi
Proudly powered by WordPress.