Tag Archives: covered business method patent review

4 Tips to Make Your Patent Portfolio AIA-Ready

The America Invents Act (AIA) has changed the way that patents are enforced. In traditional patent litigation, a patent was drafted to perform in district court. After the AIA, when patents are asserted, they are first challenged in administrative proceedings … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, claim challenges, covered business methods, inter partes review, Litigation, Post Grant Review, PTAB, PTAB Patent Trials | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pro Hac Vice Admission Denied in SAP v. Versata CBM Patent Review

My prior post described the pro hac vice admission dispute between SAP and Versata Development Group in PTAB matter CBM2012-00001.  The PTAB wasted no time and issued an order denying the motion for pro hac vice admission of Versata’s litigation … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, covered business methods, motion practice, Post Grant Review, pro hac vice admission, PRPS Patent Review Processing System, PTAB | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PTAB PRPS Trials Portal Gets Software Improvements

The PTAB PRPS Trials Portal just got better.  If you login to the system (depending on what browser you are using), you will see that PRPS now provides much better access to all public documents in each case.  This upgrade … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, covered business methods, inter partes review, motion practice, Patent Reform, Post Grant Review, PRPS Patent Review Processing System, PTAB | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Petitions Filed for AIA Inter Partes Reviews and Covered Business-Method Patent Reviews

Based on a today’s count, the PTAB Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) is now showing 34 petitions for patent review.  There are 10 pending petitions for covered business-method (CBM) patent review and 24 petitions for inter partes review (IPR). What … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, covered business methods, inter partes review, Patent Reform, Post Grant Review, PRPS Patent Review Processing System, PTAB | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Parallel Litigation and PTAB Review Create Complex Interplay of Patentability and Validity

A company called CoreLogic Solutions, LLC owns U.S. Patent No. 5,361,201, relating to a process for appraising real estate property.  The ‘201 patent was filed on Oct. 19, 1992 and issued on Nov. 1, 1994.  Absent some kind of patent term extension, the ‘201 … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation standard, claim challenges, Claim Construction, clear and convincing evidence, covered business methods, indefiniteness, Litigation, motion practice, Patent Reform, patent-eligible subject matter, Phillips-type construction, Post Grant Review, preponderance of evidence, PTAB, statutory subject matter | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PTAB Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) Update

If you are a registered user of the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) you may have encountered the same problem I did.  When logging in, I can see some matters where the petitions can be viewed, but other matters where … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, covered business methods, inter partes review, Patent Reform, Post Grant Review, PRPS Patent Review Processing System, PTAB | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment